Friday, March 02, 2007

Fair Use and Copyright Violations

One of the interesting issues that seems to have presented itself in one way or another among Wikimedia projects in general, and through Wikibooks in particular, has been a realization that perhaps far too much trust has been placed on what might qualify as legitimate and legal usage of images through the copyright doctrine of fair use.

For a complete look at the United States Code, Title 17 and specifcally section 107 that governs this philosohpy in the USA:

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include -

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.


For a law, this is a rather few words to cover such a huge topic that has spilled so much virtual ink on so many mailing lists and discussion pages. I would highly recommend grabbing the above link for some commentaries that are also listed in the formal US Code which take these ideas to much more depth and give some historical background on the issue.

One thing that should be of particular note is that in spite of the fact that the Wikimedia Foundation (and the various Wikimedia sister projects are strongly implied to fall under this umbrella) is an "official" non-profit charity, there is a general attitude to permit commercial reproduction of Wikibooks. Or at least substantial effort shouldn't be made to try and prohibit commercial reproduction. This is something that perhaps I should elaborate upon in a future blog post.

Another very common misconception is that because much of what Wikibooks does is oriented toward textbook publication, that content included on Wikibooks falls under the educational fair-use exception. If you read very closely the law as it is written above, the educational exception is meant for individual instructors and specific lessons taught in an individual classroom setting. I have seen both textual content and images that use educational fair use as the justification, but it really doesn't apply.

There is an interesting Wikibooks policy of "no original research" that is at first glance seems a little bizzare if you don't know the background of this policy. Again this will be the topic of a future blog post, but how that applies to fair use is that the research exception simply won't apply either.

So the only real area that Wikibooks can justify fair use is through the provisions of criticism, comment, and scholarship. There is an additional Wikibooks policy/philosophy of trying to maintain a neutral point of view that significantly restricts critical commentary, but it could be argued that there is a narrow scope where this may still be possible. Most of what actually happens on Wikibooks is mainly scholarly synthesis of non-fiction ideas and topics into textbooks and other educationally oriented multi-media content. So this is where even in the USA fair use applies to Wikibooks content.

There are at least three major schools of thought on this issue, and I'll try to cover them here:

  • Ban Fair Use Etirely - The primary argument here is that Wikimedia projects are based upon the GFDL, and we should be using images that are as free if not more so than the text we are writing that goes along with the text. If it is a fair-use image, there are many countries in the world that simply don't permit fair use at all and republishing something like a Wikibook won't be possible in many countries, at least as displayed on the main website with its images and other content that might be claiming fair use. At the very least, in these places where fair use is illegal, the content would have to be heavily edited to keep the fair use in there. A side argument is that the whole of the content ought to be considered available under the GFDL, not just the text itself. Fair use and restrictive content such as images allowed for non-commercial use only would violate this fundimental principle.

  • Allow All Fair Use -The main attitude here is mainly, if it is legally permissible for us to have the photos, there is no reason why we should not have it on our projects. An interesting side argument with this is that the GFDL applies only to the text of Wikimedia projects (Wikipedia and Wikibooks in particular) Clearly images other than those under the GFDL are allowed on Wikimedia projects, in particular those under the Creative Commons license. The GFDL does have an aggrigation clause which attempts to deal with this situation on a legal basis. The full quote of that is here:
    A compilation of the Document or its derivatives with other separate and independent documents or works, in or on a volume of a storage or distribution medium, is called an "aggregate" if the copyright resulting from the compilation is not used to limit the legal rights of the compilation's users beyond what the individual works permit. When the Document is included in an aggregate, this License does not apply to the other works in the aggregate which are not themselves derivative works of the Document.

    This school of thought views since the image files are stored seperately on Wikimedia servers, that the aggregation clause applies and that the text is completely independent of any images, or even the main project HTML code. Of course, fair use content does need to have a context where the fair-use rationale applies, so this isn't entirely the best argument even for this school of thought. Still, it completely isolates the Wiki markup text from the images themselves as areas of separate consideration.

  • Keep Fair Use Limited -This is admittedly a compromise and pragmatic solution to deal with advocates of either of the above two schools of thought. And it should be pointed out that the degree of limited fair use is debated even among those who would seek to put any limits on fair use at all but still permit it. The primary arguments in favor of this viewpoint are that some topics can't be written at all unless some form of fair use is permitted. Textual fair use is one specific example where the idea isn't controversial yet is a clear demonstration of where fair use may be used. Some other areas that are generally considered acceptable and widely used in commercial publications with fair use rationale under limited set of context is with the use of national symbols (like flags and seals); corporate logos; and legal tender like bank notes, stamps, and coins. Some Wikimedia projects have even codified fair use policy to only include these sorts of images and nothing more. By making the number of exceptions very limited, it makes it easy to decide if an image really does fit as a fair use image or not, and keeps projects from having to watch the news for changes in copyright laws that will likely not change or restrict these sort of items. In addition, while fair use is generally an American law concept, many other countries around the world have similar laws that permit these much more restricted categories of images without having to pay royalties or be found to violate copyright.


I'll be honest that I support the much more restrictive fair use philosophy, but still want to have some images like flags of countries (often copyrighted!) in a Wikibook that I am writing.

44 comments:

matt davis said...

I would like to join your wikibooks project, email me at mdavis [at] mgnhosting [dot[ com

AlyciaSweat said...

日本性愛學日本巨乳正妹日本女優寫真日本女優性愛影片日本女優情趣成人寫真日本女憂寫真日本女星無碼dvd日本女星杉本彩寫真日本孕婦dvd日本寫真集圖片日本寫真集影片日本寫真女郎照片日本寫真女優日本小老鼠日本少女avonline日本少女寫真dvd日本巨乳美女日本巨乳辣妹日本援交友日本聊天網站日本色情漫畫卡通日本色教館日本限制級電影日本限制集日本裸體動畫日本裸體漫畫日本裸体藝術圖片日本視訊網日本視訊美女日本視訊聊天日本視訊聊天室日本視訊分享日本視訊正妹日本視訊下載日本高中妹日本高中少女強暴寫真集照片日本色情性愛日本色情影片日本色情卡通圖日本肥胖av女優

便秘 said...

快樂與人生,是最好的伴侶..................................................

如此的 said...

If you can not be kind, at least have the decency to be vague.............................................

香蕉哥哥 said...

It's great!!.............................................

明秋 said...

大奶妹貼圖區0204性影片觀賞露點自拍淫婦女生如何自慰色情站成人笑話av激情網愛視訊美女淫蕩av成人色情電話辣妹視訊聊天性關係情色vcd自慰圖淫美成人論壇台灣色情論壇成人聊天室自拍裸女貼圖視訊成人免費a片影片av成人網成人色情色情台灣辣妹小穴太太陰毛色情訊息裸女自拍色情影片a片論壇性愛技巧美女脫胸罩情色天堂av寫真色情視訊聊天做愛視訊成人影片床上戲情色聊天網火辣情色台灣女優性愛秘笈台灣av女優手淫自慰影片

欣盈 said...

I do like ur article~!!!..................................................

惠如惠如惠如 said...

I do like ur article~!!!...................................................

邦雄 said...

恐佈哦~~
相愛?相害?
看了鬼故事之後讓你睡不著覺
洗臉的女孩
紅燒人頭,可好吃了
紅布床簾

勝傑懿綺 said...

加油!充實內函最重要!Beauty is but skin- deep. ....................................................

昭士松修 said...

格主的部落格內容真豐富~~看得很開心..................................................

文君 said...

ut聊天77p2p85cc85st85街視訊視訊聊天ava片a片下載成人情色色情影音視訊聊天洪爺影城洪爺免費視訊免費a片免費一對多utsogo論壇ut聊天室成人片免費看................

嘉宏 said...

喜歡你的部落格,留言請您繼續加油.............................................

心良 said...

人生是故事的創造與遺忘。.........................

HaroldM22 said...

成人免費線上看 日本情色視訊 ut聊天網 免費線上色情片 yam交友 女優影片分享 露點 成人免費影片觀看 偷拍貼圖站 美女聊天室 愛情 歐美情趣圖片 女優18禁 台灣絲襪美少女 85cc免費小短片影城 免費a片直撥網 av情色影片 卡通色情影片區 一夜情 影音383 完美女人影片試看 美少女 性美女愛 辣妹強姦 人妻av下載 成人 成人視訊 空姐絲襪 a片a圖論壇 偷拍寫真 85cc 免費影片欣 微風成人區成人寫真 成人嘟嘟網免費看 www.7777th.com 杜雷斯免費貼圖區 援交妹貼圖區 嘟嘟情人色網 dudu 台南鋼管秀 pub 日本av線上 洪爺影片交流區 大大奶的 ab 女傭 sex888 okk 免費下載 巨乳人妻 敏感帶 後宮無碼光碟網 限制級 0204成人影片 無碼性愛影片 走光照

韋于倫成 said...

很喜歡你的部落格風格,期待你的更新!........................................

佳慧 said...

April showers bring May flowers...................................................

宛儒DarwinM_Pawlak0203 said...

Variety is the very spice of life. ............................................................

burkere said...

104成人 歐美色情視訊 聊天 85cc 豆豆交友 女優 美女裸照 免費做愛影片 熟女辣妹 ut南部聊天室 女同愛愛 情趣影片區 18禁 少女自衛 熊貓av影城 a片. 女女情色 免費色情片 一夜情 s383 情人視訊 玩美女人 日本美女影像 歐美辣妹 人妻 人妻熟女情慾 免費視訊 免費視訊 a圖 辣妹寫真 85cc 微風交友 live173 mvp7777.net 美眉貼圖 +援交留言版 情人視訊 免費台灣辣妹 成人片觀看 洪爺影城貼圖區 大奶美女影片 sex貼圖片 免費a片 美女巨乳 性感國中生 後宮電影院 20jack 限制級成人小說 色情0204 激情性愛照 歐美偷拍走光

志維 said...

人有兩眼一舌,是為了觀察倍於說話的緣故。..................................................................

宛齊陳 said...

原來天鵝嫁給癩蛤蟆就會生出醜小鴨.................................................................

林怡洋 said...

河水永遠是相同的,可是每一剎那又都是新的。....................................................................

靜怡 said...

幸福不是一切,人還有責任。.................................................................

于庭 said...

成熟,就是有能力適應生活中的模糊。.................................................................

吳婷婷 said...

當一個人內心能容納兩樣相互衝突的東西,這個人便開始變得有價值了。............................................................

宜FH定博林P'韓T彥 said...

人生是故事的創造與遺忘。............................................................

志穎志穎 said...

Subtlety is better than force. ............................................................

謝佩雨 said...

你文章很棒的~繼續分享給大家~~~~..................................................................

楊儀卉 said...

Man is not made for defeat. A mean can be destroyed but not defeated...................................................................

于倫 said...

Riches serve a wise man but command a fool.............................................................

吳婷婷 said...

一時的錯誤不算什麼,錯而不改才是一生中永遠且最大的錯誤............................................................

林彥以林彥以 said...

People throw stones only at trees with fruit on them.............................................................

琬安琬安 said...

More haste, less speed..................................................................

謝俊柯凡豐德 said...

美麗的事物是永恆的快樂,它的可愛日有增加,不會消逝而去................................................

蕙王帆蕙王帆蕙王帆 said...

愛,拆開來是心和受兩個字。用心去接受對方的一切,用心去愛對方的所有。......................................................................

伊任柳珈南昕 said...

Pay somebody back in his own coin...................................................................

文王廷 said...

喜歡自己的另一層意義是「接納自己」。..................................................

偉曹琬 said...

I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat...................................................................

麗王王珠 said...

多謝美味的心靈雞湯......................................................

秀李李迪秀李李迪 said...

回應是最大的支持^^y~~~甘吧嗲............................................................

廷家祥家祥雯 said...

來給你加油,幫你推一下喔~期待你的下一個更新,謝謝............................................................

翊翊翊翊張瑜翊翊翊 said...

凡事三思而行,跑得太快是會滑倒的。..................................................

江仁趙雲虹昆 said...

這一生中有多少人擦肩而過?而朋友是多麼可貴啊!......................................................................

王辛江淑萍康 said...

一個人的價值,應該看他貢獻了什麼,而不是他取得了什麼......................................... ........................